Saturday, September 14, 2013

Baum: Open the books on insurance; Middletown's health-care strategy must be examined

The following Op-Ed was written by Middletown Democratic Candidate for Township Committee Linda Baum. The Op-Ed addresses the high cost of Middletown's "double-platinum" self-insured health care plan that has an average cost of $31,000 per beneficiary (under a family plan) enrolled.

The Op-Ed appeared in Wednesday's printed edition of the Asbury Park Press and online HERE:


Middletown’s $9.3-million tab for health benefits has drawn attention recently, following a decision by the township to reduce hours for 25 employees who otherwise would have qualified for future health benefits under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
Linda Baum

My research shows that Middletown’s cost for medical benefits has risen 50 percent in the last decade. Prescription payouts have risen 100 percent during that time. Steady increases long pre-date the ACA, to which officials are pointing as a cause.

Failure to address this issue falls squarely on the shoulders of our local government. Township Committeeman and current Mayor Gerry Scharfenberger, a Republican, has been in office since January 2005 and has had ample time to do something about this.

Former Committeeman Sean Byrnes, a Democrat, had proposed forming a task force of medical and insurance professionals to review and make recommendations with respect to the township’s health coverage, but the administration’s Republican majority rejected the idea.

Further, the township will not say who’s enrolled for benefits, another thing that needs review in order to get costs under control.

Knowing the names is not just a matter of weeding out people who should not be covered. We should be able to determine, for example, if retirees are properly categorized as retired vs. actively employed to ensure proper coordination of coverage. The information recently released by the township — minus the names — shows at least one person listed as “active” who is living across the country.

In July, a lawsuit was filed in state Superior Court to obtain the names of those enrolled for health benefits with Middletown Township, which claims that as a self-insured entity it is not required to release the information. Other local governments disagree. Earlier this year, Wall Township and the Wall Board of Education, both self-insured for health benefits, released the names of enrollees. And just recently, Monmouth County, which also is self-insured, did the same.

Middletown officials claim that they save money by self-insuring for health coverage, but it’s not clear how that was determined. A health insurance cost comparison prepared by the township compares Middletown’s cost of medical and pharmacy claims — self insureds pay claims rather than premiums — to the premium for a comparable plan through the State Health Benefits Program.

The comparison is faulty in that township enrollees who have other than single or family coverage — the two middle tiers are “employee and children” and “employee and spouse” — are dumped into the higher-premium family coverage bucket in determining the SHBP premium.

This improper distribution of enrollee counts inflates the estimated SHBP premium.

In addition, the analysis doesn’t reflect that one third of enrollees are retirees, for whom premiums are lower if Medicare is primary. Again, the effect is to inflate the estimated premium for the comparable coverage. The township’s self-insured cost would look better in comparison.

The poor math could easily result in an inaccurate conclusion about which insurance option is less costly for taxpayers.

Also, it is important to recognize that comparison of plans and plan costs should be done separately for medical vs. prescription coverage. The best insurance option for one may not be the best option for the other, so we should shop for these coverages separately. Wall, for example, self insures for medical benefits but has private insurance coverage with Medco for prescription benefits.

Because substantially similar benefits can vary widely in cost, it’s possible to achieve significant savings for taxpayers while still providing excellent benefits to township employees, including the 25 who would have qualified under the ACA.

Certainly, given the magnitude of the expenses we’re talking about, this is an area that deserves thorough review.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

And Linda if you should - God forbid - get elected, then you would have a say in how the township handles the administration of it's health benefits.

The township hires professionals in administration, consultants/brokers, and Third Party Administrators to ensure that healthcare is effectively and efficiently monitored.

It is not practical nor efficient to invite the public into that administration, it just isn't.

So win an election and have a say...

By the way, 5% inflation per year in the last decade is far below what actual healthcare inflation was in the country, and even the 10% annually you claim for prescription increases comports with what the country saw during that time -- exactly what are you complaining about?

Anonymous said...

The time has come for the TC to come clean about just who is receiving benefits. There is a great deal of patronage associated with Middletown's awarding of these health benefits and the "sense of entitlement" former TC members,sewage authority board members(they are also former TC members),and other republican political players, feel and even have the audacity to vocalize.

Time to come clean as the taxpayers are being taken to the cleaners and it must stop. No elected in this town should be entitled to lifetime benefits at public expense.......None!

Anonymous said...

Anon 11:00 a.m.,

IF THE PUBLIC IS EXPECTED TO PAY FOR THESE BENEFITS THAN THEY ARE ENTITLED TO KNOW WHO GETS THEM!!!

THAT"S A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD!!

WHAT ARE YOU HIDING ??????

Linda Baum said...

anon 11:00 am

You are missing the point, which is whether savings can be achieved through other coverage options and whether this has been adequately explored. All those professionals you mention cost money too and are part of the cost analysis.

By the way, the public doesn't need "an invite" to review public records, and the Township administration doesn't have a right to withhold them.

Anonymous said...

Madam Chairwoman at 11:00
AM:

Citizens are not required to win elections to have a say.

Yours truly,
A Middletown Taxpayer

Anonymous said...

Anon at 9:16

I guess that depends on what you mean by "having a say..."

Ms. Baum wants to be consulted by the Township Committee and Administration before they make any decision. That's what she considers "a say."

Every citizen has the right to express their opinion about issues, but the TC and the Administration get to make the decisions as informed by those opinions, period.

If you or Ms. Baum don't like those decisions, the only way to change that is to get elected and get to make those decisions yourself on behalf of the town...

Another Middletown Taxpayer said...

This town is run by a "mob" of petty "little" dictators.

Make no mistake about that and it has been for years !

Tools of their trade are slander,character assassination and intimidation !!!!

Anonymous said...

The TC can't "make the decisions as informed by those opinions" until they allow the public to consult with the TC and Administrator.
I'm sure the TC has made their decisions long before any member of the public has had a chance to say anything.

Anonymous said...

anon at 1:22

To which I reply...

The only way to change decisions made by those who are elected to make decisions is to elect someone else to make the decisions.

It would appear that the citizens of Middletown have been happy with the decisions made by the TC because they keep re-electing them.

Can you dispute that?

Anonymous said...

Majestic Motormouth at 11AM, 9:35AM,and 2:09:

Having a say in government does not begin and end in the voting booth. Your daily venom spewing ritual indicates that citizen participation is repellent to you and your ilk, unless of course it applies to some issue which affects you more personally. In that case, all gloves are off as far as public participation.

It really is bizarre that you spend so much time poking and prodding a candidate you believe has no chance of winning. There is something completely demented about a citizen that so relentlessly smears another citizen who is not even a public official.

What are you so afraid of dear?

Anonymous said...

Guess all those unhappy people keep voting for who they want to run the town, right?

November is coming, time for the annual spanking! Any bets on how bad its gonna be this year for the D's? I am gonna say its gonna be north of 65%. What do you think Mike?

Anonymous said...

No, citizen participation doesn't begin and end in the voting booth, but the responsibility for and the ability to make decisions does.

You don't like the decisions the TC makes - I get that. You think they should, for some reason, let the terribly small minority of people who reflexively oppose everything they do have more influence on them then the citizens who regularly vote to elect and re-elect them by large majorities. That's not the way democracy works!

Tell me this, did Patrick Short and Sean Byrnes have public meetings where the public took a poll and decided how they would vote on issues before the TC? No? Why not? Didn't they believe in "citizen participation?"

Elections have consequences. Bitch and moan about things all you want, but please stop equating decisions that don't go your way with some underhanded and un-American actions - that's just not true.

Get your guys elected and stop whining...

Anonymous said...

Anon 8:07....

Tell you anything ? You think you know it all !!!