Showing posts with label U.S Attorney General. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U.S Attorney General. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 24, 2018
Pallone to Sessions: Let the People of NJ Decide Path Forward on Marijuana Legalization
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 23, 2018
Washington, DC - Today, Congressmen Frank Pallone, Jr. (NJ-06) sent a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions asking that the Justice Department allow the people of New Jersey to choose its path forward on marijuana legalization. On January 4th, Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a memo rescinding guidance given during the Obama administration which shifted strict enforcement of federal cannabis prohibition toward a more accommodating approach for jurisdictions that have enacted laws legalizing marijuana. In November, Phil Murphy was elected Governor of New Jersey, after making marijuana legalization part of his platform.
“Residents of states like Colorado, California, Oregon, and others that have moved to legalize marijuana should have the peace of mind to know that they can engage in legal intrastate commerce without the threat of federal enforcement actions,” said Pallone. “In New Jersey, a majority of voters strongly support a campaign proposal by Governor Phil Murphy to legalize possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use. New Jerseyans understand the important implications legalizing marijuana would have for our state.”
January 23, 2018
The Honorable Jeff Sessions
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530
Dear Attorney General Sessions:
I write to urge the Department of Justice to retract the memorandum it released on January 4 regarding federal cannabis enforcement policies. The memorandum rescinded previous guidance documents that were issued by former U.S. Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole on August 29, 2013, colloquially known as the “Cole Memo,” which shifted strict enforcement of federal cannabis prohibition toward a more accommodating approach for "jurisdictions that have enacted laws legalizing marijuana in some form and that have also implemented strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems to control the cultivation, distribution, sale and possession of marijuana." The Justice Department must provide clear direction that balances rule of law with the overwhelming support for legalized marijuana in the 30 states and territories that have moved in that direction.
Rescinding the Cole Memo would once again apply federal law to the sale, purchase, and possession of marijuana that occurs entirely within the boundaries of states that have legalized such commerce, undermining the Tenth Amendment rights of the American people. Residents of states like Colorado, California, Oregon, and others that have moved to legalize marijuana should have the peace of mind to know that they can engage in legal intrastate commerce without the threat of federal enforcement actions. In the words of President Trump on October 29, 2015, “In terms of marijuana and legalization, I think that should be a state issue, state-by-state.”
In New Jersey, a majority of voters strongly support a campaign proposal by Governor Phil Murphy to legalize possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use. New Jerseyans understand the important implications legalizing marijuana would have for our state. For instance, they understand that the inclusion of marijuana in the Controlled Substance Act of 1970 and the subsequent “war on drugs” that began under President Richard Nixon have disproportionately impacted impoverished communities and communities of color. Reinstating the failed policies of the past is not the way forward.
The implications of the Justice Department’s January 4 decision on the independent rights of states are clear. I urge you to reverse this decision and to uphold the Cole Memo, which would allow states and territories to enforce their own marijuana laws without unnecessary federal interference.
Sincerely,
FRANK PALLONE, JR.
Member of Congress
Saturday, March 21, 2015
President Obama's Weekly Address 3/21/15: It's Time to Confirm Loretta Lynch
WASHINGTON, DC — In this week’s address, the President called on Republicans in Congress to stop playing politics with law enforcement and national security and confirm Loretta Lynch as Attorney General of the United States. Loretta is an independent, career prosecutor who deserves to be confirmed as soon as possible. She has proven herself time and again throughout her 30-year career, yet come Monday, the amount of time her nomination will have languished on the floor of the Senate will total more than that of the past seven Attorney General nominees combined. In his address the President asked Republicans in Congress to stop denying a vote on the nomination of Loretta Lynch and end the longest confirmation process for an Attorney General in three decades.
Tuesday, January 13, 2015
Pallone Calls On U.S. Attorney General to Investigate Misuse of E-ZPass Data by Port Authority Officials
WASHINGTON, DC — Today, Congressman Frank Pallone, Jr. (NJ-06), the Ranking Member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder requesting that the U.S. Department of Justice conduct an independent review to determine whether E-ZPass data of New Jersey drivers was repeatedly accessed by officials at the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (PANYNJ) without proper authority and, potentially, for political purposes. In the letter, Pallone made clear that any such actions violate New Jersey law and that, since New Jersey’s Attorney General is appointed by Governor Chris Christie (R-NJ) and has not announced any plans to investigate these allegations, an independent review was necessary at this time.
“It is our duty as public servants to protect the public trust,” Pallone said in the letter. “These incidents seem to demonstrate the exact opposite, showing a remarkable abuse of power and violation of privacy.”
New Jersey law states that toll records may not be released to any person, including a government agency, without a subpoena or a court order. However, in an April 2012 Senate hearing, PANYNJ Deputy Executive Director William Baroni repeatedly referenced the personal E-ZPass data of the late Senator Frank Lautenberg. Lautenberg’s private travel records were then referred to once again at a press conference held by Governor Christie. Recently, Mr. Baroni, appearing before the state legislature, also referenced detailed travel information of New Jersey drivers obtained through a review of E-ZPass records.
“The use of this data seems to go well beyond any overarching general use of statistical data for analytical purposes, and rather seems to be specific examination of the E-ZPass usage of individual drivers,” Pallone stated.
The full text of the letter is below:
January 12, 2015
The Honorable Eric Holder
Attorney General
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Dear Attorney General Holder:
I write to raise a matter of great concern. Recent media reports indicate that protected consumer E-ZPass data was repeatedly accessed by staff of the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (PANYNJ), and possibly by other government agencies, without proper authority and used for public, inappropriate, and possibly politically retaliatory purposes. I request that you direct your office to begin an immediate investigation of these breaches of privacy, and possible criminal access and use of data.
Media reports detail the well-publicized NJ Senate testimony of former PANYNJ Deputy Executive Director William Baroni, in which he repeatedly cites in his testimony the personal E-ZPass data of the late Senator Frank Lautenberg. This information was also later referred to in a press conference by Governor Christie. Reports also detail Mr. Baroni’s testimony before the NJ State Legislature, in which he refers repeatedly to detailed travel information of drivers obtained through review of E-ZPass records. Specifically, Mr. Baroni refers to travel of residents of the town of Sayreville, NJ, which is part of my Congressional District. The use of this data seems to go well beyond any overarching general use of statistical data for analytical purposes, and rather seems to be specific examination of the E-ZPass usage of individual drivers.
Such actions violate New Jersey law and are a breach of the public trust. Mr. Baroni, appointed to his position by Governor Christie, and others who may have violated the law should be held accountable. New Jersey’s Attorney General, also appointed by Governor Christie, has not announced any intention of investigating these allegations. Therefore, I ask that your office review these breaches of privacy and the actions of public officials to determine whether there is an actionable violation of law for the Department of Justice to pursue. I believe an independent review is critical at this time.
It is our duty as public servants to protect the public trust. These incidents seem to demonstrate the exact opposite, showing a remarkable abuse of power and violation of privacy.
Sincerely,
FRANK PALLONE, JR.
Member of Congress
CC: Honorable Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman, Federal Trade Commission
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
CWA To Appeal Christie Scheme To Illegally Award Lottery Functions To Politically-Connected, Foreign-Owned Firm
For Immediate Release:
Ignores Clear Legal Guidance from DOJ & NJ Constitution - Invites Lawsuit by Pushing Aside Objections
(TRENTON, NJ) “ Late yesterday, the Christie Administration brushed aside a challenge by the Communications Workers of America (CWA) that would have stopped the State from awarding control of sales and marketing of the New Jersey State Lottery to a politically-connected, foreign-owned, private firm. For months, Christie has consistently stonewalled the public regarding lottery monetization - which could cause at least 7,000 New Jersey jobs to be lost and ship a billion dollars of lottery revenue out of state and abroad. As such, the CWA and small businesses are left with no other alternative other than to oppose this illegal privatization scheme in court.
"Despite all his bluster about putting New Jersey first, Governor Christie is handing over the keys of a valuable taxpayer-owned asset to a foreign company with a clear history of fraud and abuse," said Seth Hahn, Legislative and Political Director for CWA. "Christie can claim it's a mere coincidence that the sole bidder hired his campaign manager and his campaign's lawyer as lobbyists last year - but New Jerseyans know better. Rather than working to make our award-winning lottery even stronger, Christie instead went out of his way to ignore clear legal guidance that every other state pursuing lottery privatization has followed. Christie stacked the deck against small business owners and taxpayers with this illegal scheme, ensuring that the matter will now be settled in the courts."
Last night, the Christie Administration announced via email that it was pushing aside the CWA protest of the intent to award the contract. The Department of Treasury can now move forward with awarding the contract - which could take a couple of days to finalize. This means it will be a few days before the public will even have access to the details about what is in the contract. This is simply the Christie Administration's latest move to keep things secretive. Throughout the process, the only information made available on the privatization scheme has been the result of heavily-redacted records obtained through Open Public Records Requests.
For the nearly eight months, the Christie Administration has steadfastly refused to answer basic questions about the monetization of the state's fourth-most valuable asset. The administration has ducked questions at hearings, press conferences and at every other turn. They announced the contract on Friday, April 12th at 4 pm in a continued bid to minimize public knowledge about the deal. Then, recently, a small hearing was held on the CWA's protest of the award - mostly out of the public's eye, again on a Friday afternoon and only allowing two people from CWA to attend.
The contract between the State and Northstar New Jersey Lottery Group violates the original intent and meaning of the New Jersey Constitution, as well as state law - which specifically called for establishing a lottery to be operated by the state. In other words, the constitution requires the lottery be operated publicly so private enterprises cannot damage the public's trust through even the faintest whispers of corruption. Yet, this deal allows a private company to have the lion's share of operational control over what was always intended to be a state-run lottery.
Last month, six members of New Jersey's Congressional delegation sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder asking the Department of Justice to review the contract. These House members are worried the contract runs counter to a 2008 DOJ opinion which advised that such payments have a corrupting nature and run contrary to the public interest, and therefore likely run afoul of longstanding Federal law. Every state that has moved to privatize portions of its state lottery up to this point has followed the recommendations in the memo. Christie will be the first governor to ignore the guidance of the DOJ.
The Northstar partnership consists of three groups. One is Italian-owned, one's Canadian, and the other hails from Georgia. This partnership includes GTECH, which has a checkered history of fraud, bribery and corruption stretching from Texas to Rhode Island to New Jersey. In fact, Lieutenant Governor Kim Guadagno prosecuted GTECH's national sales director for a kickback scheme in New Jersey in the 1990s when she was in the U.S. Attorney's Office. In her prosecution, Guadagno argued the firm's corruption was so rampant that the state needed to throw the book at the GTECH official. Guadagno felt so strongly that she released sealed grand jury testimony to the media - a highly unusual step for which she was reprimanded by the New Jersey District Court.
Last year, Christie conducted a study about how to make New Jersey's lottery even better. It showed our award-winning system was one of America's best-run public lotteries - ranking 5th in per capita sales. Growth in online, instant and total sales all far exceeded the national average. In 2010, it had the highest net income margin, making New Jersey our nation's most efficient lottery. Looking at all this information, Christie made the shocking decision to turn sales and marketing functions over to a foreign private corporation. Even worse, despite a 42% growth in sales in the last decade, Northstar will get a cut of profits, up to 5% - if they increase sales just 9% over the next 15 years.
Northstar New Jersey Lottery Group is nearly identical to the firm running the show in Illinois. Following that takeover's first year, they admitted being over $100 million short of revenue projections. The firm then entered into a legal process with the State of Illinois claiming taxpayers owed them $230 million. In just the first half-decade of the contract, they now estimate being $250 million short of revenue estimates.
Aside from being illegal, this scheme is simply bad policy. With nearly one in ten New Jerseyans already out-of-work, lottery privatization is a bad deal - which would make foreign corporations rich while making things worse for taxpayers and small businesses. The Asian American Retailers Association estimates Christie's privatization deal could result in 7,000 jobs lost and that's their conservative estimate. Also, the Christie administration says Northstar New Jersey Lottery Group could earn $1 billion over the life of the contract - meaning a large chunk of lottery profits will be shipped out-of-state and overseas, instead of staying here at home. Moreover, as part of the deal, the state will receive a one-shot, upfront $120 million payment from Northstar. This gimmick has already been taken into account along with other rosy revenue projections for the latest Christie budget proposal.
With all these damning facts coming to light, it's no surprise the Christie Administration has consistently ducked questions and released precious little information on lottery privatization from throughout this process. CWA knows it is clear from what scant details do exist that the contract is illegal, and, as such, will be going to court to appeal.
Ignores Clear Legal Guidance from DOJ & NJ Constitution - Invites Lawsuit by Pushing Aside Objections
(TRENTON, NJ) “ Late yesterday, the Christie Administration brushed aside a challenge by the Communications Workers of America (CWA) that would have stopped the State from awarding control of sales and marketing of the New Jersey State Lottery to a politically-connected, foreign-owned, private firm. For months, Christie has consistently stonewalled the public regarding lottery monetization - which could cause at least 7,000 New Jersey jobs to be lost and ship a billion dollars of lottery revenue out of state and abroad. As such, the CWA and small businesses are left with no other alternative other than to oppose this illegal privatization scheme in court.
"Despite all his bluster about putting New Jersey first, Governor Christie is handing over the keys of a valuable taxpayer-owned asset to a foreign company with a clear history of fraud and abuse," said Seth Hahn, Legislative and Political Director for CWA. "Christie can claim it's a mere coincidence that the sole bidder hired his campaign manager and his campaign's lawyer as lobbyists last year - but New Jerseyans know better. Rather than working to make our award-winning lottery even stronger, Christie instead went out of his way to ignore clear legal guidance that every other state pursuing lottery privatization has followed. Christie stacked the deck against small business owners and taxpayers with this illegal scheme, ensuring that the matter will now be settled in the courts."
Last night, the Christie Administration announced via email that it was pushing aside the CWA protest of the intent to award the contract. The Department of Treasury can now move forward with awarding the contract - which could take a couple of days to finalize. This means it will be a few days before the public will even have access to the details about what is in the contract. This is simply the Christie Administration's latest move to keep things secretive. Throughout the process, the only information made available on the privatization scheme has been the result of heavily-redacted records obtained through Open Public Records Requests.
For the nearly eight months, the Christie Administration has steadfastly refused to answer basic questions about the monetization of the state's fourth-most valuable asset. The administration has ducked questions at hearings, press conferences and at every other turn. They announced the contract on Friday, April 12th at 4 pm in a continued bid to minimize public knowledge about the deal. Then, recently, a small hearing was held on the CWA's protest of the award - mostly out of the public's eye, again on a Friday afternoon and only allowing two people from CWA to attend.
The contract between the State and Northstar New Jersey Lottery Group violates the original intent and meaning of the New Jersey Constitution, as well as state law - which specifically called for establishing a lottery to be operated by the state. In other words, the constitution requires the lottery be operated publicly so private enterprises cannot damage the public's trust through even the faintest whispers of corruption. Yet, this deal allows a private company to have the lion's share of operational control over what was always intended to be a state-run lottery.
Last month, six members of New Jersey's Congressional delegation sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder asking the Department of Justice to review the contract. These House members are worried the contract runs counter to a 2008 DOJ opinion which advised that such payments have a corrupting nature and run contrary to the public interest, and therefore likely run afoul of longstanding Federal law. Every state that has moved to privatize portions of its state lottery up to this point has followed the recommendations in the memo. Christie will be the first governor to ignore the guidance of the DOJ.
The Northstar partnership consists of three groups. One is Italian-owned, one's Canadian, and the other hails from Georgia. This partnership includes GTECH, which has a checkered history of fraud, bribery and corruption stretching from Texas to Rhode Island to New Jersey. In fact, Lieutenant Governor Kim Guadagno prosecuted GTECH's national sales director for a kickback scheme in New Jersey in the 1990s when she was in the U.S. Attorney's Office. In her prosecution, Guadagno argued the firm's corruption was so rampant that the state needed to throw the book at the GTECH official. Guadagno felt so strongly that she released sealed grand jury testimony to the media - a highly unusual step for which she was reprimanded by the New Jersey District Court.
Last year, Christie conducted a study about how to make New Jersey's lottery even better. It showed our award-winning system was one of America's best-run public lotteries - ranking 5th in per capita sales. Growth in online, instant and total sales all far exceeded the national average. In 2010, it had the highest net income margin, making New Jersey our nation's most efficient lottery. Looking at all this information, Christie made the shocking decision to turn sales and marketing functions over to a foreign private corporation. Even worse, despite a 42% growth in sales in the last decade, Northstar will get a cut of profits, up to 5% - if they increase sales just 9% over the next 15 years.
Northstar New Jersey Lottery Group is nearly identical to the firm running the show in Illinois. Following that takeover's first year, they admitted being over $100 million short of revenue projections. The firm then entered into a legal process with the State of Illinois claiming taxpayers owed them $230 million. In just the first half-decade of the contract, they now estimate being $250 million short of revenue estimates.
Aside from being illegal, this scheme is simply bad policy. With nearly one in ten New Jerseyans already out-of-work, lottery privatization is a bad deal - which would make foreign corporations rich while making things worse for taxpayers and small businesses. The Asian American Retailers Association estimates Christie's privatization deal could result in 7,000 jobs lost and that's their conservative estimate. Also, the Christie administration says Northstar New Jersey Lottery Group could earn $1 billion over the life of the contract - meaning a large chunk of lottery profits will be shipped out-of-state and overseas, instead of staying here at home. Moreover, as part of the deal, the state will receive a one-shot, upfront $120 million payment from Northstar. This gimmick has already been taken into account along with other rosy revenue projections for the latest Christie budget proposal.
With all these damning facts coming to light, it's no surprise the Christie Administration has consistently ducked questions and released precious little information on lottery privatization from throughout this process. CWA knows it is clear from what scant details do exist that the contract is illegal, and, as such, will be going to court to appeal.
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Lautenberg Highlights Additional News Corp. Hacking Allegation in the U.S. as DOJ Review Begins
Lautenberg Flagged News Corp. Hacking Allegations with Federal Authorities in 2005
WASHINGTON—As the Justice Department reviews claims that News Corp. hacked into the phone records or voicemails of American 9/11 victims, U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) today wrote to Attorney General Eric Holder and FBI Director Robert Mueller to highlight a 2005 hacking allegation in the United States that was made against a News Corp. marketing company called News America Marketing.
Lautenberg originally wrote a letter in 2005 bringing this case to the attention of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales after a small New Jersey marketing company called FLOORgraphics alleged that News America Marketing engaged in illegal computer espionage by breaking into password protected computer systems and obtaining confidential information.
“As the Department of Justice and FBI examine the recent hacking allegations involving News Corp. and its subsidiaries more closely, I wanted to make sure that you were fully aware of the case of FLOORgraphics and News America, as it may be relevant to your current investigation,” Lautenberg wrote.
A copy of today’s letter can be found here
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Quote of The Day: "...He obviously was not only thinking of running for governor, he was seeking input..."
"This to me puts to bed the claim that he did not think about running for governor until he left the U.S. Attorney's Office and had done a lot of soul searching before he made his decision...He obviously was not only thinking of running for governor, he was seeking input from the White House deputy chief of staff, George Bush's chief strategist."
Lt. Governor Candidate Lorretta Weinberg reacting to the news that Republican candidate for governor Chris Christie, had conversations with White House deputy chief of staff, Karl Rove about running for governor of NJ while still acting as U.S. Attorney.
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Was Christie A Pay-to-Play "Pioneer"
The latest Corzine '09 campaign ad that was released today clarifies the connections between Chris Christie and his "Pioneer" status for his massive political contributions to George Bush, and his subsequently being named as U.S. Attorney—a classic example of pay to play. Once he purchased his office, Christie brazenly awarded his political allies and fellow Bush cronies millions in no bid contracts.
Here are the Facts:
Chris Christie was a George W. Bush Pioneer and helped raise over $350,000 for Bush. Gannett News Service, in 2003, asked, “What motivates a ranger or pioneer?” One of their answers was, “there's political patronage as well. Three of Bush's 21 New Jersey pioneers in 2000 won presidential appointments. Former Republican congressman William Martini was named a federal judge, Internet communications executive Clifford Sobel was named ambassador to the Netherlands, and former Morris County Freeholder Christopher Christie was named New Jersey's top federal prosecutor.” The Star Ledger, in 2004, also indentified Christie as a Bush Pioneer. According to the New York Times, “He became counsel to the Bush campaign in New Jersey in 2000, while joining Mr. Palatucci to raise more than $350,000.” The Washington Post and Bergen Record have also reported that Christie helped raise $350,000 for George W. Bush [Gannett News Service, 11/7/03; Star Ledger, 11/19/04;New York Times, 7/21/04; Washington Post, 11/27/02; Asbury Park Press, Bergen Record, 10/10/02]
Chris Christie was named U.S. Attorney in return for his Bush fundraising. A Star Ledger editorial, in 2001, decried Christie’s appointment to U.S. Attorney and stated, “What Christie brings to the table is excellent political connections. He has energetically raised money for various candidates, including George W. Bush in 2000, and his mentor and law partner is William Palatucci, a friend of the President and a powerful figure in the state GOP… It is common for U.S. attorneys to have political ties, but Christie's party links are closer than most. This is a patronage appointment, plain and simple. This is a distinguished position, one of the most important jobs in the state. It should not become a political plum.” The New York times reported that “after the Bush victory, Mr. [Bill] Palatucci sent Mr. Christie's resume to Karl Rove, the president's chief strategist. Mr. Bush, who dubbed Mr. Christie ''Big Boy'' (an apparent reference to his hulking frame), chose him for United States attorney.” [Star Ledger, 9/7/01; New York Times, 7/21/04]
Christie went soft on crime by refusing to indict companies that ripped off the American public. Chris Christie decided not to indict several companies; instead, he gave them deferred prosecutions agreements. As the Gloucester County Times noted, these “agreements basically let potential corporate criminals go free in exchange for paying millions to have ‘monitors’ oversee their affected operations.” In an editorial titled “Going Soft on Corporate Crime,” the New York Times described deferred prosecution agreements as “cozy deals” and wrote, “Federal prosecutors have been regularly offering settlements to companies for wrongdoing that, in previous administrations, would likely have led to criminal charges. It is another disturbing example of how [the Bush] administration has taken the justice out of the Justice Department…. The cost [of deferred prosecution agreements] to the public and the rule of law is too high. If corporations believe that they can negotiate their way out of a prosecution, the deterrent effect of the criminal law will inevitably be weakened.” [Gloucester County Times, 6/27/09; Associated Press, 6/24/09; New York Times, 4/10/08]
Chris Christie awarded Bush cronies millions in no-bid contracts. “When the top federal prosecutor in New Jersey needed to find an outside lawyer to monitor a large corporation willing to settle criminal charges out of court last fall, he turned to former Attorney General John Ashcroft, his onetime boss. With no public notice and no bidding, the company awarded Mr. Ashcroft an 18-month contract worth $28 million to $52 million…. The New Jersey prosecutor, United States Attorney Christopher J. Christie, directed similar monitoring contracts last year to two other former Justice Department colleagues from the Bush administration, as well as to a former Republican state attorney general in New Jersey.” [New York Times, 1/10/08]
Chris Christie is pushing for the same Bush economic policies that wrecked our economy. Chris Christie’s proposed economic policies include Bush re-treads such as tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations and opposition to government regulations that protect the public. Christie has pledged to cut income taxes for the “very top of the wage scale.” Christie has also said “it will be a priority for the Christie administration to reduce corporate business tax rates.” While Christie has been vague on specifics, he has consistently voiced broad opposition to government regulations and has said he will “rollback,” “rescind” and “freeze” New Jersey regulations. The New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance regulations include “consumer protections through the regulation of 16 types of businesses that provide a variety of consumer financial services.” The Department regulates “state-chartered credit unions through on-site examinations and report filings to ensure safety and soundness, as well as compliance with applicable state and federal laws.” [Fox News, Neil Cavuto, 5/4/09; 55 Way Chris Christie Will Fix New Jersey, http://www.votesmart.org/speech_detail.php?sc_id=459712&keyword=&phrase=&contain=; Gannet News, 5/16/09; 88 Ways Chris Christie Will Fix New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance, http://www.state.nj.us/dobi/division_banking/index.htm
Christie is recklessly calling for tax cuts without a plan to pay for them – just like Bush. The Philadelphia Inquirer opined, “Christie, incredibly, says if elected he will cut income taxes and corporate taxes across the board. Sound good? You bet it does. But as this governor's race progresses, Christie will need to fill in a few gaps of his own. He stands to inherit the same conditions that have been battering New Jersey's economy for the past two years. For example, how would Christie balance the state budget while lowering revenue further through tax cuts? Corzine will have cut the budget in absolute dollars two years in a row. That's unprecedented in any state, and especially in New Jersey. Tax cuts would require even deeper budget reductions by Christie. That's not to say it can't be done, but Christie was deliberately vague during the Republican primary campaign about how he intends to achieve even bigger savings in Trenton.... coasting time is over for Christie. Now, he must tell voters with specificity how he would tackle the same long-term problems more effectively.” [Philadelphia Inquirer 6/7/09]
Chris Christie was named U.S. Attorney in return for his Bush fundraising. A Star Ledger editorial, in 2001, decried Christie’s appointment to U.S. Attorney and stated, “What Christie brings to the table is excellent political connections. He has energetically raised money for various candidates, including George W. Bush in 2000, and his mentor and law partner is William Palatucci, a friend of the President and a powerful figure in the state GOP… It is common for U.S. attorneys to have political ties, but Christie's party links are closer than most. This is a patronage appointment, plain and simple. This is a distinguished position, one of the most important jobs in the state. It should not become a political plum.” The New York times reported that “after the Bush victory, Mr. [Bill] Palatucci sent Mr. Christie's resume to Karl Rove, the president's chief strategist. Mr. Bush, who dubbed Mr. Christie ''Big Boy'' (an apparent reference to his hulking frame), chose him for United States attorney.” [Star Ledger, 9/7/01; New York Times, 7/21/04]
Christie went soft on crime by refusing to indict companies that ripped off the American public. Chris Christie decided not to indict several companies; instead, he gave them deferred prosecutions agreements. As the Gloucester County Times noted, these “agreements basically let potential corporate criminals go free in exchange for paying millions to have ‘monitors’ oversee their affected operations.” In an editorial titled “Going Soft on Corporate Crime,” the New York Times described deferred prosecution agreements as “cozy deals” and wrote, “Federal prosecutors have been regularly offering settlements to companies for wrongdoing that, in previous administrations, would likely have led to criminal charges. It is another disturbing example of how [the Bush] administration has taken the justice out of the Justice Department…. The cost [of deferred prosecution agreements] to the public and the rule of law is too high. If corporations believe that they can negotiate their way out of a prosecution, the deterrent effect of the criminal law will inevitably be weakened.” [Gloucester County Times, 6/27/09; Associated Press, 6/24/09; New York Times, 4/10/08]
Chris Christie awarded Bush cronies millions in no-bid contracts. “When the top federal prosecutor in New Jersey needed to find an outside lawyer to monitor a large corporation willing to settle criminal charges out of court last fall, he turned to former Attorney General John Ashcroft, his onetime boss. With no public notice and no bidding, the company awarded Mr. Ashcroft an 18-month contract worth $28 million to $52 million…. The New Jersey prosecutor, United States Attorney Christopher J. Christie, directed similar monitoring contracts last year to two other former Justice Department colleagues from the Bush administration, as well as to a former Republican state attorney general in New Jersey.” [New York Times, 1/10/08]
Chris Christie is pushing for the same Bush economic policies that wrecked our economy. Chris Christie’s proposed economic policies include Bush re-treads such as tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations and opposition to government regulations that protect the public. Christie has pledged to cut income taxes for the “very top of the wage scale.” Christie has also said “it will be a priority for the Christie administration to reduce corporate business tax rates.” While Christie has been vague on specifics, he has consistently voiced broad opposition to government regulations and has said he will “rollback,” “rescind” and “freeze” New Jersey regulations. The New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance regulations include “consumer protections through the regulation of 16 types of businesses that provide a variety of consumer financial services.” The Department regulates “state-chartered credit unions through on-site examinations and report filings to ensure safety and soundness, as well as compliance with applicable state and federal laws.” [Fox News, Neil Cavuto, 5/4/09; 55 Way Chris Christie Will Fix New Jersey, http://www.votesmart.org/speech_detail.php?sc_id=459712&keyword=&phrase=&contain=; Gannet News, 5/16/09; 88 Ways Chris Christie Will Fix New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance, http://www.state.nj.us/dobi/division_banking/index.htm
Christie is recklessly calling for tax cuts without a plan to pay for them – just like Bush. The Philadelphia Inquirer opined, “Christie, incredibly, says if elected he will cut income taxes and corporate taxes across the board. Sound good? You bet it does. But as this governor's race progresses, Christie will need to fill in a few gaps of his own. He stands to inherit the same conditions that have been battering New Jersey's economy for the past two years. For example, how would Christie balance the state budget while lowering revenue further through tax cuts? Corzine will have cut the budget in absolute dollars two years in a row. That's unprecedented in any state, and especially in New Jersey. Tax cuts would require even deeper budget reductions by Christie. That's not to say it can't be done, but Christie was deliberately vague during the Republican primary campaign about how he intends to achieve even bigger savings in Trenton.... coasting time is over for Christie. Now, he must tell voters with specificity how he would tackle the same long-term problems more effectively.” [Philadelphia Inquirer 6/7/09]
The number of unemployed Americans has increased by more than 7 million since the recession began. According to the U.S Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the number of unemployed persons has increased by 7.2 million.” [Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit
Friday, February 20, 2009
Remarks as Prepared for Delivery by Attorney General Eric Holder at the Department of Justice African American History Month Program
The following is the text of the speech that was delivered by Attornry General Eric Holder at the Justice Department on Wednesday February 18th, in honour of Black History Month. It sparked the right wing rants of Rush Limbaugh and others.
Every year, in February, we attempt to recognize and to appreciate black history. It is a worthwhile endeavor for the contributions of African Americans to this great nation are numerous and significant. Even as we fight a war against terrorism, deal with the reality of electing an African American as our President for the first time and deal with the other significant issues of the day, the need to confront our racial past, and our racial present, and to understand the history of African people in this country, endures. One cannot truly understand America without understanding the historical experience of black people in this nation. Simply put, to get to the heart of this country one must examine its racial soul.
Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards. Though race related issues continue to occupy a significant portion of our political discussion, and though there remain many unresolved racial issues in this nation, we, average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about race. It is an issue we have never been at ease with and given our nation’s history this is in some ways understandable. And yet, if we are to make progress in this area we must feel comfortable enough with one another, and tolerant enough of each other, to have frank conversations about the racial matters that continue to divide us. But we must do more- and we in this room bear a special responsibility. Through its work and through its example this Department of Justice, as long as I am here, must - and will - lead the nation to the "new birth of freedom" so long ago promised by our greatest President. This is our duty and our solemn obligation.
We commemorated five years ago, the 50th anniversary of the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision. And though the world in which we now live is fundamentally different than that which existed then, this nation has still not come to grips with its racial past nor has it been willing to contemplate, in a truly meaningful way, the diverse future it is fated to have. To our detriment, this is typical of the way in which this nation deals with issues of race. And so I would suggest that we use February of every year to not only commemorate black history but also to foster a period of dialogue among the races. This is admittedly an artificial device to generate discussion that should come more naturally, but our history is such that we must find ways to force ourselves to confront that which we have become expert at avoiding.
As a nation we have done a pretty good job in melding the races in the workplace. We work with one another, lunch together and, when the event is at the workplace during work hours or shortly thereafter, we socialize with one another fairly well, irrespective of race. And yet even this interaction operates within certain limitations. We know, by "American instinct" and by learned behavior, that certain subjects are off limits and that to explore them risks, at best embarrassment, and, at worst, the questioning of one’s character. And outside the workplace the situation is even more bleak in that there is almost no significant interaction between us. On Saturdays and Sundays America in the year 2009 does not, in some ways, differ significantly from the country that existed some fifty years ago. This is truly sad. Given all that we as a nation went through during the civil rights struggle it is hard for me to accept that the result of those efforts was to create an America that is more prosperous, more positively race conscious and yet is voluntarily socially segregated.
As a nation we should use Black History month as a means to deal with this continuing problem. By creating what will admittedly be, at first, artificial opportunities to engage one another we can hasten the day when the dream of individual, character based, acceptance can actually be realized. To respect one another we must have a basic understanding of one another. And so we should use events such as this to not only learn more about the facts of black history but also to learn more about each other. This will be, at first, a process that is both awkward and painful but the rewards are potentially great. The alternative is to allow to continue the polite, restrained mixing that now passes as meaningful interaction but that accomplishes little. Imagine if you will situations where people- regardless of their skin color- could confront racial issues freely and without fear. The potential of this country, that is becoming increasingly diverse, would be greatly enhanced. I fear however, that we are taking steps that, rather than advancing us as a nation are actually dividing us even further. We still speak too much of "them" and not "us". There can, for instance, be very legitimate debate about the question of affirmative action. This debate can, and should, be nuanced, principled and spirited. But the conversation that we now engage in as a nation on this and other racial subjects is too often simplistic and left to those on the extremes who are not hesitant to use these issues to advance nothing more than their own, narrow self interest. Our history has demonstrated that the vast majority of Americans are uncomfortable with, and would like to not have to deal with, racial matters and that is why those, black or white, elected or self-appointed, who promise relief in easy, quick solutions, no matter how divisive, are embraced. We are then free to retreat to our race protected cocoons where much is comfortable and where progress is not really made. If we allow this attitude to persist in the face of the most significant demographic changes that this nation has ever confronted- and remember, there will be no majority race in America in about fifty years- the coming diversity that could be such a powerful, positive force will, instead, become a reason for stagnation and polarization. We cannot allow this to happen and one way to prevent such an unwelcome outcome is to engage one another more routinely- and to do so now.
As I indicated before, the artificial device that is Black History month is a perfect vehicle for the beginnings of such a dialogue. And so I urge all of you to use the opportunity of this month to talk with your friends and co-workers on the other side of the divide about racial matters. In this way we can hasten the day when we truly become one America.
It is also clear that if we are to better understand one another the study of black history is essential because the history of black America and the history of this nation are inextricably tied to each other. It is for this reason that the study of black history is important to everyone- black or white. For example, the history of the United States in the nineteenth century revolves around a resolution of the question of how America was going to deal with its black inhabitants. The great debates of that era and the war that was ultimately fought are all centered around the issue of, initially, slavery and then the reconstruction of the vanquished region. A dominant domestic issue throughout the twentieth century was, again, America's treatment of its black citizens. The civil rights movement of the 1950's and 1960's changed America in truly fundamental ways. Americans of all colors were forced to examine basic beliefs and long held views. Even so, most people, who are not conversant with history, still do not really comprehend the way in which that movement transformed America. In racial terms the country that existed before the civil rights struggle is almost unrecognizable to us today. Separate public facilities, separate entrances, poll taxes, legal discrimination, forced labor, in essence an American apartheid, all were part of an America that the movement destroyed. To attend her state’s taxpayer supported college in 1963 my late sister in law had to be escorted to class by United States Marshals and past the state’s governor, George Wallace. That frightening reality seems almost unthinkable to us now. The civil rights movement made America, if not perfect, better.
In addition, the other major social movements of the latter half of the twentieth century- feminism, the nation's treatment of other minority groups, even the anti-war effort- were all tied in some way to the spirit that was set free by the quest for African American equality. Those other movements may have occurred in the absence of the civil rights struggle but the fight for black equality came first and helped to shape the way in which other groups of people came to think of themselves and to raise their desire for equal treatment. Further, many of the tactics that were used by these other groups were developed in the civil rights movement.
And today the link between the black experience and this country is still evident. While the problems that continue to afflict the black community may be more severe, they are an indication of where the rest of the nation may be if corrective measures are not taken. Our inner cities are still too conversant with crime but the level of fear generated by that crime, now found in once quiet, and now electronically padlocked suburbs is alarming and further demonstrates that our past, present and future are linked. It is not safe for this nation to assume that the unaddressed social problems in the poorest parts of our country can be isolated and will not ultimately affect the larger society.
Black history is extremely important because it is American history. Given this, it is in some ways sad that there is a need for a black history month. Though we are all enlarged by our study and knowledge of the roles played by blacks in American history, and though there is a crying need for all of us to know and acknowledge the contributions of black America, a black history month is a testament to the problem that has afflicted blacks throughout our stay in this country. Black history is given a separate, and clearly not equal, treatment by our society in general and by our educational institutions in particular. As a former American history major I am struck by the fact that such a major part of our national story has been divorced from the whole. In law, culture, science, athletics, industry and other fields, knowledge of the roles played by blacks is critical to an understanding of the American experiment. For too long we have been too willing to segregate the study of black history. There is clearly a need at present for a device that focuses the attention of the country on the study of the history of its black citizens. But we must endeavor to integrate black history into our culture and into our curriculums in ways in which it has never occurred before so that the study of black history, and a recognition of the contributions of black Americans, become commonplace. Until that time, Black History Month must remain an important, vital concept. But we have to recognize that until black history is included in the standard curriculum in our schools and becomes a regular part of all our lives, it will be viewed as a novelty, relatively unimportant and not as weighty as so called "real" American history.
I, like many in my generation, have been fortunate in my life and have had a great number of wonderful opportunities. Some may consider me to be a part of black history. But we do a great disservice to the concept of black history recognition if we fail to understand that any success that I have had, cannot be viewed in isolation. I stood, and stand, on the shoulders of many other black Americans. Admittedly, the identities of some of these people, through the passage of time, have become lost to us- the men, and women, who labored long in fields, who were later legally and systemically discriminated against, who were lynched by the hundreds in the century just past and those others who have been too long denied the fruits of our great American culture. The names of too many of these people, these heroes and heroines, are lost to us. But the names of others of these people should strike a resonant chord in the historical ear of all in our nation: Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. DuBois, Walter White, Langston Hughes, Marcus Garvey, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Joe Louis, Jackie Robinson, Charles Drew, Paul Robeson, Ralph Ellison, James Baldwin, Toni Morrison, Vivian Malone, Rosa Parks, Marion Anderson, Emmit Till. These are just some of the people who should be generally recognized and are just some of the people to whom all of us, black and white, owe such a debt of gratitude. It is on their broad shoulders that I stand as I hope that others will some day stand on my more narrow ones.
Black history is a subject worthy of study by all our nation's people. Blacks have played a unique, productive role in the development of America. Perhaps the greatest strength of the United States is the diversity of its people and to truly understand this country one must have knowledge of its constituent parts. But an unstudied, not discussed and ultimately misunderstood diversity can become a divisive force. An appreciation of the unique black past, acquired through the study of black history, will help lead to understanding and true compassion in the present, where it is still so sorely needed, and to a future where all of our people are truly valued.
Thank you.
Read it and decide for yourself whether or not you are offened by it:
Every year, in February, we attempt to recognize and to appreciate black history. It is a worthwhile endeavor for the contributions of African Americans to this great nation are numerous and significant. Even as we fight a war against terrorism, deal with the reality of electing an African American as our President for the first time and deal with the other significant issues of the day, the need to confront our racial past, and our racial present, and to understand the history of African people in this country, endures. One cannot truly understand America without understanding the historical experience of black people in this nation. Simply put, to get to the heart of this country one must examine its racial soul.
Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards. Though race related issues continue to occupy a significant portion of our political discussion, and though there remain many unresolved racial issues in this nation, we, average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about race. It is an issue we have never been at ease with and given our nation’s history this is in some ways understandable. And yet, if we are to make progress in this area we must feel comfortable enough with one another, and tolerant enough of each other, to have frank conversations about the racial matters that continue to divide us. But we must do more- and we in this room bear a special responsibility. Through its work and through its example this Department of Justice, as long as I am here, must - and will - lead the nation to the "new birth of freedom" so long ago promised by our greatest President. This is our duty and our solemn obligation.
We commemorated five years ago, the 50th anniversary of the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision. And though the world in which we now live is fundamentally different than that which existed then, this nation has still not come to grips with its racial past nor has it been willing to contemplate, in a truly meaningful way, the diverse future it is fated to have. To our detriment, this is typical of the way in which this nation deals with issues of race. And so I would suggest that we use February of every year to not only commemorate black history but also to foster a period of dialogue among the races. This is admittedly an artificial device to generate discussion that should come more naturally, but our history is such that we must find ways to force ourselves to confront that which we have become expert at avoiding.
As a nation we have done a pretty good job in melding the races in the workplace. We work with one another, lunch together and, when the event is at the workplace during work hours or shortly thereafter, we socialize with one another fairly well, irrespective of race. And yet even this interaction operates within certain limitations. We know, by "American instinct" and by learned behavior, that certain subjects are off limits and that to explore them risks, at best embarrassment, and, at worst, the questioning of one’s character. And outside the workplace the situation is even more bleak in that there is almost no significant interaction between us. On Saturdays and Sundays America in the year 2009 does not, in some ways, differ significantly from the country that existed some fifty years ago. This is truly sad. Given all that we as a nation went through during the civil rights struggle it is hard for me to accept that the result of those efforts was to create an America that is more prosperous, more positively race conscious and yet is voluntarily socially segregated.
As a nation we should use Black History month as a means to deal with this continuing problem. By creating what will admittedly be, at first, artificial opportunities to engage one another we can hasten the day when the dream of individual, character based, acceptance can actually be realized. To respect one another we must have a basic understanding of one another. And so we should use events such as this to not only learn more about the facts of black history but also to learn more about each other. This will be, at first, a process that is both awkward and painful but the rewards are potentially great. The alternative is to allow to continue the polite, restrained mixing that now passes as meaningful interaction but that accomplishes little. Imagine if you will situations where people- regardless of their skin color- could confront racial issues freely and without fear. The potential of this country, that is becoming increasingly diverse, would be greatly enhanced. I fear however, that we are taking steps that, rather than advancing us as a nation are actually dividing us even further. We still speak too much of "them" and not "us". There can, for instance, be very legitimate debate about the question of affirmative action. This debate can, and should, be nuanced, principled and spirited. But the conversation that we now engage in as a nation on this and other racial subjects is too often simplistic and left to those on the extremes who are not hesitant to use these issues to advance nothing more than their own, narrow self interest. Our history has demonstrated that the vast majority of Americans are uncomfortable with, and would like to not have to deal with, racial matters and that is why those, black or white, elected or self-appointed, who promise relief in easy, quick solutions, no matter how divisive, are embraced. We are then free to retreat to our race protected cocoons where much is comfortable and where progress is not really made. If we allow this attitude to persist in the face of the most significant demographic changes that this nation has ever confronted- and remember, there will be no majority race in America in about fifty years- the coming diversity that could be such a powerful, positive force will, instead, become a reason for stagnation and polarization. We cannot allow this to happen and one way to prevent such an unwelcome outcome is to engage one another more routinely- and to do so now.
As I indicated before, the artificial device that is Black History month is a perfect vehicle for the beginnings of such a dialogue. And so I urge all of you to use the opportunity of this month to talk with your friends and co-workers on the other side of the divide about racial matters. In this way we can hasten the day when we truly become one America.
It is also clear that if we are to better understand one another the study of black history is essential because the history of black America and the history of this nation are inextricably tied to each other. It is for this reason that the study of black history is important to everyone- black or white. For example, the history of the United States in the nineteenth century revolves around a resolution of the question of how America was going to deal with its black inhabitants. The great debates of that era and the war that was ultimately fought are all centered around the issue of, initially, slavery and then the reconstruction of the vanquished region. A dominant domestic issue throughout the twentieth century was, again, America's treatment of its black citizens. The civil rights movement of the 1950's and 1960's changed America in truly fundamental ways. Americans of all colors were forced to examine basic beliefs and long held views. Even so, most people, who are not conversant with history, still do not really comprehend the way in which that movement transformed America. In racial terms the country that existed before the civil rights struggle is almost unrecognizable to us today. Separate public facilities, separate entrances, poll taxes, legal discrimination, forced labor, in essence an American apartheid, all were part of an America that the movement destroyed. To attend her state’s taxpayer supported college in 1963 my late sister in law had to be escorted to class by United States Marshals and past the state’s governor, George Wallace. That frightening reality seems almost unthinkable to us now. The civil rights movement made America, if not perfect, better.
In addition, the other major social movements of the latter half of the twentieth century- feminism, the nation's treatment of other minority groups, even the anti-war effort- were all tied in some way to the spirit that was set free by the quest for African American equality. Those other movements may have occurred in the absence of the civil rights struggle but the fight for black equality came first and helped to shape the way in which other groups of people came to think of themselves and to raise their desire for equal treatment. Further, many of the tactics that were used by these other groups were developed in the civil rights movement.
And today the link between the black experience and this country is still evident. While the problems that continue to afflict the black community may be more severe, they are an indication of where the rest of the nation may be if corrective measures are not taken. Our inner cities are still too conversant with crime but the level of fear generated by that crime, now found in once quiet, and now electronically padlocked suburbs is alarming and further demonstrates that our past, present and future are linked. It is not safe for this nation to assume that the unaddressed social problems in the poorest parts of our country can be isolated and will not ultimately affect the larger society.
Black history is extremely important because it is American history. Given this, it is in some ways sad that there is a need for a black history month. Though we are all enlarged by our study and knowledge of the roles played by blacks in American history, and though there is a crying need for all of us to know and acknowledge the contributions of black America, a black history month is a testament to the problem that has afflicted blacks throughout our stay in this country. Black history is given a separate, and clearly not equal, treatment by our society in general and by our educational institutions in particular. As a former American history major I am struck by the fact that such a major part of our national story has been divorced from the whole. In law, culture, science, athletics, industry and other fields, knowledge of the roles played by blacks is critical to an understanding of the American experiment. For too long we have been too willing to segregate the study of black history. There is clearly a need at present for a device that focuses the attention of the country on the study of the history of its black citizens. But we must endeavor to integrate black history into our culture and into our curriculums in ways in which it has never occurred before so that the study of black history, and a recognition of the contributions of black Americans, become commonplace. Until that time, Black History Month must remain an important, vital concept. But we have to recognize that until black history is included in the standard curriculum in our schools and becomes a regular part of all our lives, it will be viewed as a novelty, relatively unimportant and not as weighty as so called "real" American history.
I, like many in my generation, have been fortunate in my life and have had a great number of wonderful opportunities. Some may consider me to be a part of black history. But we do a great disservice to the concept of black history recognition if we fail to understand that any success that I have had, cannot be viewed in isolation. I stood, and stand, on the shoulders of many other black Americans. Admittedly, the identities of some of these people, through the passage of time, have become lost to us- the men, and women, who labored long in fields, who were later legally and systemically discriminated against, who were lynched by the hundreds in the century just past and those others who have been too long denied the fruits of our great American culture. The names of too many of these people, these heroes and heroines, are lost to us. But the names of others of these people should strike a resonant chord in the historical ear of all in our nation: Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. DuBois, Walter White, Langston Hughes, Marcus Garvey, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Joe Louis, Jackie Robinson, Charles Drew, Paul Robeson, Ralph Ellison, James Baldwin, Toni Morrison, Vivian Malone, Rosa Parks, Marion Anderson, Emmit Till. These are just some of the people who should be generally recognized and are just some of the people to whom all of us, black and white, owe such a debt of gratitude. It is on their broad shoulders that I stand as I hope that others will some day stand on my more narrow ones.
Black history is a subject worthy of study by all our nation's people. Blacks have played a unique, productive role in the development of America. Perhaps the greatest strength of the United States is the diversity of its people and to truly understand this country one must have knowledge of its constituent parts. But an unstudied, not discussed and ultimately misunderstood diversity can become a divisive force. An appreciation of the unique black past, acquired through the study of black history, will help lead to understanding and true compassion in the present, where it is still so sorely needed, and to a future where all of our people are truly valued.
Thank you.
Rush: I’m No Coward On Race, I Stood Up To Media’s ‘Slavish Coverage Of Black Quarterbacks’

Related to a couple of my previous posts comes the latest Rush Limbaugh rant on race relations.
El Rushbo as he refers to himself, is commenting on U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder's comments on February 18Th, in which he called America "a nation of cowards' on racial matters at the Justice Department, in honoring Black History Month.
This post and video clip from Think Progress explains El Rushbo's rant and puts it into persective:
Yesterday, Attorney General Eric Holder said that the U.S. has acted as a “nation of cowards” when it comes to discussing the sometimes “awkward and painful” issue of race relations. Today on his radio show, however, conservative talker Rush Limbaugh rejected Holder’s view claiming, “I, El Rushbo, am no coward. … I show bravery on race” by standing up to the media’s “slavish coverage of black quarterbacks”:
LIMBAUGH: I, El Rushbo, am no coward. … In fact, I show bravery on race. I am totally willing to discuss it openly and honestly. How does one show bravery on race as I have? You talk about media bias, you talk about slavish media coverage of Black quarter backs in the National Football League. Then see what happens. Then watch all hell descend upon you from every quarter of this nation’s media. From print to broadcast to internet. … I show bravery on matters of race.
Limbaugh is clearly still bitter about the fact that he was forced to resign from his position as an ESPN commentator in 2003 for claiming that the media were only interested in Philadelphia Eagles Quarterback Donovan McNabb because he is black (despite the fact that McNabb has shown himself to be incredibly talented):
Sorry to say this, I don’t think he’s been that good from the get-go. I think what we’ve had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. There is a little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn’t deserve.
By citing the McNabb episode as a “brave” moment in the history of race-relations, Limbaugh actually reaffirmed Holder’s point. As Holder explained yesterday, discussions surrounding race and public policy in American society ought to be “nuanced, principled and spirited.” But too often, we leave the conversation to “those on the extremes who are not hesitant to use these issues to advance nothing more than their own, narrow self interest.”
The result is a de facto acceptance and even endorsement of Limbaugh’s repeated race-based outbursts and criticism of public officials who choose to speak out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

