Showing posts with label Monmouth County Reliability Project (MCRP). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Monmouth County Reliability Project (MCRP). Show all posts

Friday, October 27, 2017

Sean Byrnes, NJ State Senate Candidate (LD13) Answers 10 Questions

Today, it's Sean Byrnes's turn to have his answers to my 10 questions posted. Sean is the candidate for the NJ State Senate for the 13th legislative district. Sean is a Middletown resident and former member of the Middletown Township Committee. He is a veteran, business owner, lawyer and dedicated volunteer in his community.


What is your motivation for seeking a seat in the NJ State Senate and can you tell us a little about yourself?

I did not plan on running, but I am concerned with the direction of our State, and the treatment of working families. Our State has experienced 11 bond downgrades during the Christie Administration, which makes borrowing money very expensive for our State. We have the 2nd worst bond rating in the country. We are the highest taxed State. We have the most debt per taxpayer. By any measure, we are overtaxed, and the considerable, tangible assets of our State (e.g. shoreline, highway system, universities, proximity to NYC, port, educational system) have been squandered by an Administration focused on the White House rather than NJ residents. My opponent, one of the Governor’s staunchest supporters, cannot hide form this dismal record.

While things look bleak right now, we have a unique opportunity to shape our own destiny at a time when technology is evolving, sustainable energy sources are taking hold and cyber security emerges as an industry that promises to employ many qualified individuals. New Jersey has an opportunity to cultivate a business environment that brings together a mix of higher education institutions, entrepreneurs, new businesses and thoughtful state incentives dedicated to rebuilding our economy.

As you meet residents throughout your district what seems to be the greatest concerns they are expressing and how do you plan to address them?

Sean Byrnes
Taxes, the opioid crisis and a lack of good jobs seem to be the top three. The taxes we pay are the product of a misuse of the taxes collected by our State. The State has dramatically increased tax breaks for large corporations during the Christie Administration. In the decade before he came to office, the State gave a total of $1.2 Billion in taxes. Since he came to office, the State as granted approximately $8B in tax breaks. The State does a lousy job measuring the effectiveness of these large corporate giveaways. I would prefer to see these tax breaks to corporations scaled back and given to individual taxpayers, who will re-invest those funds in our local economy. If corporate tax breaks are going to be given, they should go to the small up and coming businesses, who produced new jobs are a far faster rate the large corporations. In addition, we must create incentives for municipalities and schools to share services, and when appropriate, consolidate. We have 565 municipalities and 590 school systems. By comparison, Maryland has 20 school districts. With that said, we can’t skimp when it comes to education. We have the second best educational system in the country, and this makes us a very attractive State for business. However, there are plenty of examples where some consolidation would be appropriate.

On the Opioid crisis, we need to fund and support longer periods of rehab for those suffering from addiction. We also need to understand that to a significant degree our current crisis stems from the flood of opioids sold by pharmaceutical companies. There is no legitimate justification for the incredible surge of opioids into the market place, and the makers and distributors of these substances must share some of the blame for this crisis. To the extent specific companies have ignored requirements or regulations that would have stemmed the flow of these substances into our communities, they must be held accountable and must share in the financial burden of helping those who suffer the consequences.

Lastly, to move forward and lift our economy, we need a vision and a plan. We need to cultivate those industries and segments of the market place that will be growth areas for years to come (e.g. cyber security, sustainable energy, nanomaterials, advanced robotics). We need financial incentives for students to pursue degrees suited for these growth areas. We need to make capital more available to small businesses. We need our institutions of higher learning to lead the way in education new workers, and retraining existing workers, so that New Jersey residents are ready and trained pursue employment in these areas.

What do you hope to accomplish once you are elected to the State Senate?

We must address the underfunding of pensions and benefits. Our failure to fund these has degraded our bonding rating and increased our cost of doing business. We must fund our community colleges, because the training and re-training of our workers will occur at these colleges. Four-year colleges are extremely expensive, and workers can be educated and land good jobs without taking on the debt associated with a four-year university. In general, I want to improve our State’s financial position and help grow our economy.


What is it that makes your district unique and how does that uniqueness impact your campaign?

Our District is unique, because of its socioeconomic diversity and its desirability. Lots of people want to live in Monmouth County. Our challenge is to make sure Monmouth County is affordable for everyone up and down the socioeconomic ladder. Ever-increasing real estate taxes, a lack of jobs that pay well, and ever-increasing costs of health care, make it very difficult for working families to survive and live in Monmouth County.


If elected, how would your professional background enhance your ability to be an effective State Senator?

As an attorney, I have an advantage when it comes to understanding our State’s laws and regulations and how they impact our citizens. Moreover, I have spent much of my time practicing law representing individuals and small businesses. From real estate transactions, to lawsuits, to defending people in foreclosure, to minor criminal offenses, I have had a front row seat on how our citizens are impacted by our State’s law. I have also seen how the individual in our society has lost many of the protections once available. If you are mistreated or overcharged by a large corporation, bank, cable company, cell phone carrier or any other multi-national corporation, your ability to seek a remedy or stop abusive behavior is almost non-existent. A surge of money into politics has titled the scales against the working family. I hope to have an opportunity to work on laws that protect working families.


 Do you have any thoughts on how to contain the growth of state government?

You simply must cap it. No more adding jobs. We live in a time when technology continues to advance at a rapid rate, making certain tasks easier and less time-consuming. In the private sector, this has caused a reduction in hours to produce certain products. As a State, we too should be able to deliver more with less. There is no reason for any further growth, and we should look for opportunities to curtail growth.


Is there any aspect of state government that you believe there is a need to be expanded upon?

No.


Why should residents of your district trust you to represent them in the legislature?

I have been representing individuals and small businesses in this area for almost 30 years. I have served on multiple not for profit Boards that serve our community. I have served in the Coast Guard for 21 years. I am loyal; I mean what I say, and I will work hard for the citizens of this District.


What does it mean to be a Democrat today?

My Democratic Party needs to return to its roots. We need to advocate and work every day for the working family. Fairness in jobs. Fairness in our legal system. Fairness in benefits. Fairness in our economy. The surge of money into politics allowed by Citizens United has altered the playing field. Wealth inequality is real. Income inequality is real. People don’t want or need a handout, but they need a fair share. I believe the current economy, including our tax code, favors the larger, corporate interests, and we must work hard to ensure that people have access to good jobs and fair wages. When we do that, everyone benefits.

We must also ensure that all are protected. Regardless of gender, age, color, race, orientation, we must all have the same opportunities and same protections under our laws.

We also need not be fearful. There are those in the media and public domain who hope to divide us by sowing fear and exaggerating dangers, to divide us. We must not give in to these fears. They are not rational, and they run contrary to our history, the bravery of those men and women who created this Republic, and the very ideals that underpin our democracy.


Is there anything that is important to you that has not been asked, that you would like to address?

In our District, we have a large powerline project proposed. I have studied it, reviewed the justifications, and determined it is unnecessary. I don’t believe the redundancy cited to as justifying the Project is real, or even if it were real, will ever justify the vast damage that will be done to our community. I have fought this Project, and I will continue to fight it. I will use my law degree, and if elected, my Office, to beat back this ill-conceived Project.



You can learn more about Sean Byrnes on his website Byrnes4senate.com

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

Video: Byrnes Rages On Against Monmouth County Reliability Project


Middletown resident Sean Byrnes, is running for the NJ State Senate in LD13 and will be a much needed advocate for the people in the district.

In this video he talks about his efforts to help the community group, Residents Against Giant Electric (RAGE) with it's fight against the Monmouth County Reliability Project (MCRP) and JCP&L



I have taken concrete practical steps to stop this project and help @RAGE 2016. In Trenton I will stand up for our neighborhoods which would be permanently scarred by this project, and for residents worried about having transmission lines in their back yards.

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

Mariel DiDato, State Assembly Candidate (LD13) Answers 10 Questions

I came up with these candidate questions several years ago and have been asking those running for the State Assembly, State Senate and County Freeholder ever since, if they would be kind enough to answer them. Today, I'm posting the response from Hazlet's Mariel DiDato, candidate for NJ State Assembly in 13th Legislative District. In the coming days I'll post the responses from her running mates Tom Giaimo and Sean Byrnes. I'm also hoping to have responses from Freeholder candidates Margie Donlon and Brian Wilton. - MM


What is your motivation for seeking a seat in the NJ State Assembly and can you tell us a little about yourself?

I am a crisis response advocate for victims of domestic and sexual violence, and also a grassroots organizer who has fought to get state funding restored to family planning healthcare. Since the cuts to family planning healthcare, bacterial STI infection rates in Monmouth County have risen by 50%. My motivation for running is because our current representatives in the 13th District are making legislative decisions based on party politics, and not based on science, best practices, and what is beneficial for their constituents. This is not how government should operate, and it is not how we move our state forward.

As you meet residents throughout your district what seems to be the greatest concerns they are expressing and how do you plan to address them?

Mariel DiDato
The greatest concerns I have seen are economic issues (property taxes & college affordability), the opioid epidemic, and issues concerning our environment. Municipal consolidation and shared services is one of the most viable options for providing property tax relief. We must provide more financial incentives and flexibility for towns looking to consolidate. Additionally, we need to get a hold on the rising cost of tuition, and possibly impose a cap on interest rates for student loans. 7%, 8%, 11% loans are astronomically high for a group of people who are expected to work for free or in low-wage internships after college, especially with tuition becoming increasingly expensive.

In regard to the opioid epidemic, we need better quality rehabilitation centers and recovery programs that middle and working class people can access. Currently, those suffering from addiction have two options – fly down to Florida (if you have health insurance and a bit of cash) or try your luck at a sub-par rehabilitation center in New Jersey. There is no reason why we cannot have quality, highly regulated rehabilitation centers in our state. To pay for it, we can start by holding pharmaceutical companies accountable, and taxing them on the revenue that they receive from their opioid sales. We can then use that revenue to improve the quality of our rehab centers by expanding the available recovery programs, the length of an inpatient stay, and the number of beds that we have.

Lastly, we need to do all we can at the state and local levels to compensate for the cuts to the EPA by the federal administration. We need to make sure our Shore Protection Master Plan is up to date, and that our Shore Protection Fund is fully funded. We need to prohibit oil and gas companies from drilling off of the Jersey Shore, and we need to work to ensure that we lead the way in environmental sustainability.

What do you hope to accomplish once you are elected to the State Assembly?

I have a number of goals I would like to accomplish in the Assembly. First, I want to restore state funding to family planning healthcare. Additionally, we need to do more to address interpersonal violence in our state. I will to introduce legislation to start having conversations in our public schools about consent, interpersonal violence, and the local resources available to survivors. Right now, there is a big push to have these conversations on college campuses, and that is a great start. But we know that if we wait till college to have these conversations, we are waiting until it’s too late.

I would also like to introduce the legislation I referred to above; imposing a tax on pharmaceutical companies for their opioid sales and using that revenue to improve our rehab centers in New Jersey. We can also be doing more to regulate those centers, by requiring recovery programs offer additional resources other than an AA and NA-derived program. Recovery is not a one-size-fits-all solution, and our centers should reflect that while put the latest science (which considers addiction a disease) at the forefront of those recovery programs.

Lastly, I hope to make this state more affordable for all generations by encouraging municipal consolidation and creating regulations to prevent banks from taking advantage of students seeking higher education.

What is it that makes your district unique and how does that uniqueness impact your campaign?

The 13th legislative district is composed of towns that range from extremely wealthy like Rumson to those undergoing serious economic stress like Keansburg. The policy preferences and concerns of all of these towns are not always in alignment in some areas, and one of the unique challenges for this district is ensuring that all constituents have their voices heard. Our current representation has failed to balance the needs of every constituent in our district.

If elected, how would your professional background enhance your ability to be an effective State Assembly representative?

Effective legislators are people who listen to constituents in times of personal crisis while helping them navigate the, at times, difficult bureaucracy of our state. My experience as a Crisis Response Advocate has prepared me for this role.

Do you have any thoughts on how to contain the growth of state government?

We can start by consolidating municipal services and incentivizing shared service agreements between towns. I would support regular audits on the state level to see which services provided at the state, county, and municipal level are duplicative and unnecessary.

Is there any aspect of state government that you believe there is a need to be expanded upon?

I believe that our state government is big enough, and that the issue facing us in this regard is ensuring that our state government is nimble enough to respond to the issues facing New Jersey’s residents. I believe that as we cut down on wasteful duplicative spending, we can re-allocate those resources to combatting the opioid epidemic plaguing our state. We need to ensure that those who have become addicted to opioids receive treatment, but we must also ensure that state and local law enforcement have the tools they need to address this concern on the ground level.

Why should residents of your district trust you to represent them in the legislature?

I am not the typical politician. Unlike my opponents, politics has never been my career. I am running because our representatives have failed to listen or represent us. My experience as a crisis response advocate has been to listen to people in their time of need and ensure their voices are heard by those who need to listen. In Trenton, I will do the same for every voice in our district.

What does it mean to be a Democrat today?

Being a Democrat today means to support policies which provide for equal opportunity for every person in New Jersey

Is there anything that is important to you that has not been asked that you would like to address?

Yes. I believe that the Monmouth County Reliability Project is a bad idea for our towns, and a bad idea for NJ Transit. Placing steel towers as high as 210 feet tall under 100 feet from residential properties will hurt the property values of homeowners. I also do not see how the project can be completed without serious impacting the ability of NJ Transit to continue commuter rail services along the line which so many of us rely on. I understand that First Energy and JCP&L find the guaranteed rate of return promised them by our Federal Government to be attractive, but that does not give them the right to harm the quality of life of residents throughout our district.

In Trenton I will fight with every fiber of my being to ensure that this project is not completed, and that residents from our towns are protected from future attempts by companies like First Energy and JCP&L.


You can find out more about Mariel DiDato on her website didato4njassembly.com 


Friday, October 20, 2017

Letter: Why I Oppose JCP&L's Power Line Project



Editor,

Tom Giaimo
My name is Tom Giaimo and I have lived in Middletown all my life. While JCP&L’s proposed transmission line would not run next to my house, and would not affect me and my family directly, this project is one of the reasons I have decided to run for state office this November. Having long enjoyed the beauty of our parks, our historic districts and the overall quality of life of our communities, I am expressing my strong opposition to JCP&L’s Monmouth County Reliability Project (“MCRP”). JCP&L, with this proposed $111 million project, plans to install a 3rd 230 kV transmission line along NJ Transit’s railroad “right of way”, which runs from Aberdeen to Red Bank. This proposed transmission line is unnecessary, redundant, and will run through some of the most densely populated neighborhoods in our district. The proposed line would be placed over an active commuter rail line utilized by thousands every day. Moreover, it will run adjacent to schools, parks and homes, notwithstanding that studies have linked power line exposure to serious health risks such as cancer, childhood leukemia and Alzheimer’s. If installed, the project will negatively impact the health and safety of our citizens, including the most vulnerable, our youth and seniors. It will have a detrimental effect upon parks and schools adjacent to the rail line and will destroy the environmentally sensitive area known as the Navesink River Watershed. Without question, the homes next to or close to the proposed line will have their market value drastically reduced, in fact some properties will simply become unmarketable. Life in Middletown and in all the other impacted towns will be negatively changed to the detriment of its citizens and its taxpayers who would have to foot the bill for this project.

So with all these serious issues surrounding the proposed line, one wonders: why build it? And one should look no further than JCP&L’s parent company, First Energy’s earnings report, which states that “we continue to view the transmission business as our primary growth platform for many years to come.” It is reprehensible that JCP&L would even propose this project out of its need to increase its bottom line, at the clear expense of Monmouth County residents, and amid the mounting health, environmental and economic concerns.

As a NJ Assemblyman I will always advocate for policies that are future forward, environmentally conscious and most importantly, put people over profits.



Sincerely,

Tom Giaimo
Middletown Resident
Assembly Candidate, District 13


Tuesday, April 11, 2017

March 29, 2017 MCRP Hearing at Brookdale Community College


The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) conducted this public hearing to obtain evidence in order to make a recommendation to the BPU on whether JCP&L should be allowed to use the NJ Transit right of way to construct a 230kV power line from Aberdeen to Red Bank.

You can read the Asbury Park Press for a quick take on what transpired during the meeting.







Friday, March 24, 2017

Pallone Calls on New Jersey Board of Public Utilities to Reject Monmouth County Reliability Project




FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 23, 2017



Long Branch - Today in a letter to Richard Mroz, President of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, Congressman Frank Pallone, Jr. (NJ-06) asked the board to accept a motion by Monmouth County local communities to stay consideration of Jersey Central Power and Light’s (JCP&L) application to construct the Monmouth County Reliability Project (MCRP). The plan for JCP&L’s new transmission line would impact Aberdeen, Hazlet and Middletown in Pallone’s district and run along New Jersey Transit’s North Jersey Coast line.

Earlier this year, the state Rate Counsel raised questions about the necessity of the project to increase reliability in Monmouth County. The Rate Counsel described a number of technological alternatives that could increase reliability without requiring the construction of a transmission line like MCRP. Additionally, many residents have argued that the project is unnecessary and potentially harmful to the public health, environment, and economy of their communities. The plan states that poles will be up to 210 feet tall in some places, and many residents are worried that this will negatively affect their home values. Pallone testified at the January 25th public hearing on MCRP in Middletown and expressed his opposition.

Pallone has long voiced concerns with JCP&L’s proposal. In October, Pallone sent a letter to the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU) voicing his concerns over JCP&L’s proposal for the MCRP. In August, he shared his concerns with BPU regarding JCP&L’s proposal to transfer all of its transmission assets to Mid-Atlantic Interstate Transmission. JCP&L withdrew its transfer proposal in September, a week after Pallone’s statement.

The text of the letter is below.



March 23, 2017



The Honorable Richard Mroz
President
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities
44 S. Clinton Avenue
Trenton, NJ 08625

Re: Docket No. EO16080750

Dear President Mroz:

I write regarding the upcoming March 24, 2017 meeting of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU) to consider the motion by Monmouth County local communities to stay consideration of Jersey Central Power and Light’s (JCP&L) application to construct the Monmouth County Reliability Project (MCRP). I strongly encourage you and the other commissioners to grant their motion.

As part of seeking approval for the proposed 10-mile transmission line, which would run through my Congressional district, JCP&L must obtain permission from NJ Transit to use existing rights-of-way along the North Jersey Coast Line. Despite having failed to consider fully other options, JCP&L has made it clear that it believes that this route is the only viable one for this project. NJ Transit has not yet consented to use of its right-of-way.

There is no substantive reason for the BPU to continue consideration of JCP&L’s project application for the MCRP until the company obtains the necessary approval for use of the right-of-way from NJ Transit. Going forward with proceedings is a waste of resources for all parties until JCP&L can produce the required land-use agreement. Recognizing this, in October, communities that would be impacted by the MCRP filed a motion to dismiss or stay the approval process. Unfortunately, Administrative Law Judge Cookson declined to grant that motion. The towns have now appealed to BPU, and the Board should seriously consider their case. Failure to grant this motion ensures that additional time and resources will be devoted to considering this ill-conceived project, despite JCP&L having failed to secure the land and other perquisites necessary for it to build the project.

Additionally, it is important to point out that, when JCP&L proposed a substantially similar transmission project in 1989, Administrative Law Judge Perselay ruled that if the utility had not secured a land-use agreement with NJ Transit prior to the evidentiary hearing’s start date, the approval process could not move forward. BPU should honor that precedent when considering its decision on the towns’ appeal to reconsider their motion.

Thank you for attention to this matter.

Sincerely,


FRANK PALLONE, JR.
Member of Congress


Friday, January 27, 2017

Pallone Voices Opposition to Monmouth County Reliability Project at Public Hearing




FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 26, 2017




Long Branch, NJ – Last night, Congressman Frank Pallone, Jr. (NJ-06) voiced his opposition to the Monmouth County Reliability Project (MCRP) at a public hearing held at Middletown High School North in Middletown, NJ. The hearing was overseen by Office of Administrative Law Judge Gail M. Cookson, as part of the process to determine the recommendation she will be making to the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU) on whether the BPU should approve the MCRP. Pallone also asked that additional public hearings be held to ensure that all those potentially impacted by the MCRP have an opportunity have their voices heard.

Congressman Pallone is opposed to the project, as he was when the project was proposed over two decades ago. Last week in a letter to James Fakult, President of Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L), Congressman Pallone called on JCP&L to withdraw the proposed MCRP. The plan for JCP&;L’s new transmission line would impact Aberdeen, Hazlet and Middletown in Pallone’s district and run along New Jersey Transit’s North Jersey Coast line.

Earlier this month, the state Rate Counsel released a number of technological alternatives that could increase reliability without requiring the construction of a transmission line like MCRP. Towns and community groups share this opposition to the project, including Residents Against Giant Electric (RAGE), who reached out to Congressman Pallone express their concerns. Residents in affected towns are worried that the project is harmful to the public health, environment, and economy of their communities.

Congressman Pallone's statement for the hearing can be found below:

Thank you Judge Cookson for holding this public hearing on the Monmouth County Reliability Project (MCRP). I also want to thank the many citizens of the communities this project would affect for making their voices heard tonight.

When this project was first proposed last summer, I voiced a number of concerns about the need for and effectiveness of this project. After careful study and consultation with my constituents, I come before you today to ask that you recommend that the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJ BPU) reject the MCRP.

My opposition to this project stems from two primary issues; my skepticism that the MCRP is the best and most cost-effective way to ensure reliability in Monmouth County, and the near universal opposition from the communities that would be affected by this project.

As you know, this proposal comes from Jersey Central Power and Light (JCP&L), which is a subsidiary of the Ohio-based FirstEnergy Corporation. The stated objective of the MCRP is to increase electrical reliability for customers in Monmouth County. The project is very similar to a project proposed some 25 years ago that was strongly opposed by local communities and groups before being withdrawn.

The MCRP includes constructing a 10-mile, 230-kilovolt transmission line, running from Aberdeen along the New Jersey Transit corridor right-of-way through several Monmouth County communities before terminating in Red Bank. In order for the MCRP to move forward, JCP&L must receive approval from NJ Transit to construct along its right-of-way in addition to securing the approval of the NJ BPU. . NJ Transit has not yet issued a decision on the MCRP.

Ever since this project was initially proposed, I have articulated concerns about whether constructing MCRP is necessary to accomplish JCP&L’s stated reliability goals. I do not question that JCP&L has had issues with reliability in this area over the years, and ensuring the reliability of electric utility services is indeed important. In the past, building a new transmission line may have been the only way to increase reliability. However, now there are other options available to meet reliability standards. Other options, including distributed generation and various new grid technologies, can not only increase reliability, but also modernize the grid, providing more flexibility and efficiency.

Unfortunately, it is clear that instead of exploring these alternatives, JCP&L determined that it wanted to build a transmission line, and that was that.

If JCP&L was serious about improving reliability with minimal disruption to the lives of those who live in the communities along the proposed route, it would have fully explored all alternative solutions which would satisfy the standards set forth by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). A more complete assessment of all alternatives would enable NJ BPU and the affected communities to determine the most cost-effective and least disruptive option to accomplish reliability goals.

I am not alone in expressing misgivings about the MCRP. Earlier this month, the state Rate Counsel submitted a number of comments on the MCRP to the NJ BPU. The Rate Counsel questioned the necessity of the project for meeting its proposed goal of increasing reliability of the portion of the grid serving Monmouth County. In addition to describing the use of alternative technologies such as static compensators, distributed generation, and other new grid technologies, the Rate Counsel expressed concerns about how the proposed route was chosen and potential problems associated with co-locating the lines with NJ Transit railway service.

It is not just elected and government officials expressing concerns about this project. There has been continued opposition from communities along the proposed route. Ever since this project was proposed last year, my constituents have communicated their concerns about this project. One of the issues raised by community members is the impact the MCRP could have on the value of their homes. Specifically this relates to the height of the line and the poles that this plan states are necessary, which will be up to 210 feet tall in places. In November, I joined Congressman Chris Smith, NJ Transit Board Members, state and local representatives, and concerned citizens on a tour of the proposed power line route. I was able to see firsthand the proposed height and width of these poles, and I heard directly from the people who would be most affected by the completion of this project.

As I expressed in the letter I sent to JCP&L’s President, Mr. James V. Fakult last week, when all of these concerns and issues are put together, it is clear that MCRP is not the best or most cost effective way to increase reliability in Monmouth County. I believe, the company should explore other alternatives to constructing this disruptive project.

Judge Cookson, I respectfully ask that you advise NJ BPU to deny approval of the MCRP.

Thank you again for holding this hearing and for your consideration of my views and those of my constituents in this important matter.


Wednesday, January 11, 2017

JCP&L Public Hearing January 25th



On January 25 there will be a public hearing with JCP&L regarding the 230kV power lines they have proposed installing along the NJ Transit right of way from Red Bank to Aberdeen. The meeting will be held in the Auditorium of High School North at 7pm.

If you are unsure of what this project involves, or the impact it could have on all property owners in Middletown, you should attend. If you are opposed to this project, for any reason, you should attend to show your support in opposing it.

This will be the only public hearing where you can get up and go on the record to tell JCP&L how you feel about this. Opposition to the project is mounting and there will be hearings by the BPU to determine if it is warranted. NJ Transit has not provided JCP&L access to the right of way along the train tracks. They have not denied them access either. if there is enough public support, NJ Transit could deny access to JCP&L and the project will be terminated.



Monday, December 5, 2016

Pallone Sends Letter Requesting Hearing on JCP&L’s Proposal to Increase Transmission Rates



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 5, 2016


Long Branch, NJ - Today, Congressman Frank Pallone, Jr. (NJ-06) sent a letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission voicing his concerns over Jersey Central Power and Light’s (JCP&L) proposal to increase electric transmission rates in 2017. Pallone requested a public hearing on the proposal which would increase rates by 150% and argues that “any increase of this magnitude should be carefully scrutinized.”

Pallone has voiced concerns with other JCP&L proposals which could have negative impacts on New Jersey communities. In October, Pallone sent a letter to the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU) voicing his concerns over Jersey Central Power and Light’s (JCP& L) proposal for the Monmouth County Reliability Project (MCRP). The plan for JCP&L’s new transmission line would impact Aberdeen, Hazlet and Middletown in Pallone’s district and run along New Jersey Transit’s North Jersey Coast line. Many residents have argued that the project is unnecessary and potentially harmful to the public health, environment, and economy of their communities. In August, he shared his concerns with BPU regarding JCP&L’s proposal to transfer all of its transmission assets to Mid-Atlantic Interstate Transmission. JCP&L withdrew its transfer proposal in September, a week after Pallone’s statement.

The text of the letter can be found below:

December 5, 2016

The Honorable Norman Bay
Chairman
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20426

Dear Chairman Bay:

I write regarding Jersey Central Power & Light’s (JCP&L) proposal to increase electric transmission rates in 2017. I respectfully request that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) hold a hearing on this proposal to determine whether it is necessary, just and reasonable, particularly in regard to the impact the increase would have on ratepayers. The public should also be allowed an opportunity to comment on this proposal.

As you know, FERC’s approval is necessary for any rate increase by JCP&L to take effect. In making its decision, FERC should take into account concerns raised by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, the state Division of Rate Counsel, and other stakeholder groups. This rate increase could be a significant burden on ratepayers; according to the Rate Counsel, JCP&L’s proposal would increase rates by 150%. FERC should hold a hearing to investigate a rate increase of this magnitude.

This is not the only JCP&L proposal my constituents have concerns about. Over the past year, JCP&L, and its parent company FirstEnergy, attempted to transfer all of JCP&L’s transmission assets to a separate company, Mid-Atlantic Interstate Transmission, and to build a new 10-mile transmission line in my district, known as the Monmouth County Reliability Project. While the benefits of these proposals for ratepayers are dubious, JCP&L would certainly reap financial benefits if either of these proposals were approved.

That is why I am respectfully urging FERC to provide a serious and sincere opportunity for the public to comment on JCP&L’s proposed rate increase. New Jersey ratepayers should not be subjected to onerous energy costs, and any increase of this magnitude should be carefully scrutinized.

Thank you in advance for your most serious consideration of this request.

Sincerely,

FRANK PALLONE, JR
Member of Congress



Thursday, November 3, 2016

October 2016 BOE Workshop Meetings

I spent this past Saturday and Sunday I spent 4 hours watching the videos of the October 19th & October 24th Middletown Board of Education meetings.  The time spent sitting there watching 4 hours of video was mind numbing but there were a few things that stood out and should be discussed.

BOE Workshop Meeting - October 19, 2016


During the Workshop meeting the BOE discussed:
  • The proposed new Civility Policy (59:08-1:02:38).
  • An update on the ongoing security upgrades in the Middletown schools was discussed along with which groups (Tier I, Tier II, Tier III) using the schools need to provide security and how it would be paid for (1:09:03-1:33:38).
  • And proposing a joint resolution with area towns affected by the JCP&L proposal for the Monmouth County Reliability Project (MCRP). (1:33:43-2:04:26 ). During the discussion, it was suggested that school funds be used to join the legal action against JCP&L, which may or may not be legal.
During Public Comments Jamie Curcio (2:31:30-2:40:24) and Dorothy Ginda (2:40:26-2:57:12) spoke about their ongoing concerns about school security, whether or not Tier III groups can be banned from school buildings and questioned the BOE whether or not they are taking seriously the risks to students, a charge that Dr, George took extreme exception to.

Here are the links to the Meeting Agenda and Meeting Minutes

BOE Voting Meeting - October 24, 2016


At this meeting it was officially announced that the BOE will be spending school dollars joining the legal challenge against the JCP&L's Monmouth County Reliability Project (15:45-16:30). Two members of the public them spoke on the issue.

When the time came for the adoption of the resolution to join the fight against JCP&L (26:25-29:26), it was adopted unanimously, which is troubling to me. Two board members are directly impacted by the power lines that JCP&L are proposing to erect and they chose to vote in favor of using an unspecified about of money from the education funds to fight the proposal. These two board members should have abstained. Especially since the legality of using school funds for such an endeavor, is murky at best.

During a discussion of old business pertaining the Facilities Committee (42:57-46:30), a discussion about field upgrades/improvements at Thorne Middle School was reintroduced and decided to place it on the agenda for December.

The meeting ended once again with resident  Dorothy Ginda, discussing school safety and where the issue stands after the last meeting.

Here is the link to the Meeting Agenda



Wednesday, November 2, 2016

Congressman Pallone Sends Letter Raising Serious Concerns over JCP&L’s Monmouth County Reliability Project




FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 31, 2016


Long Branch, NJ - Today, Congressman Frank Pallone, Jr. (NJ-06) sent a letter to the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities voicing his concerns over Jersey Central Power and Light’s (JCP&L) proposal for the Monmouth County Reliability Project (MCRP). The plan for JCP&L’s new transmission line would impact Aberdeen, Hazlet and Middletown in Pallone’s district and run along New Jersey Transit’s North Jersey Coast line. Many residents have argued that the project is unnecessary and potentially harmful to the public health, environment, and economy of their communities.

The text of the letter can be found below:


New Jersey Board of Public Utilities
44 South Clinton Avenue
Trenton, NJ 08625


Dear Commissioners:

I write regarding serious concerns I have with the Jersey Central Power and Light’s (JCP&L) recently submitted application to construct the Monmouth County Reliability Project (MCRP). As the Congressman representing 3 of the towns the project impacts, and thousands of the residents, it is incumbent on me to raise a number of issues.

The MCRP is reminiscent of a similar project proposed some 25 years ago that residents of Hazlet Township strongly opposed before it was withdrawn. Since JCP&L announced this project, I have been contacted by residents of Hazlet and other affected communities in my district who believe the project to be unnecessary, as well as potentially harmful to the public health, environment, and economy of their communities.

JCP&L has stated that the reason for the MCRP is “to enhance service and modernize the electric system.” However, project skeptics rightly question whether blowing the dust off these old plans is the best way to accomplish these goals. While the regulatory standards for what constitutes reliability may not have changed since 1898, the technology by which we can achieve reliability has transformed dramatically. In the 1980’s, redundant transmission lines may have been the only way to guarantee reliability, but that is hardly the case in the 21st century.

It is time to start looking at reliability and resiliency in different ways than we did in the last century. We must modernize our electricity system to make it more resilient. We can now do that by incorporating technologies to manage demand and by generating and storing power closer to where it is consumed, through use of batteries and distributed generation resources including renewables like rooftop solar. These can be connected by microgrids and isolated-lower voltage lines that move electricity locally to neighborhoods and homes – that is the most vulnerable part of the grid, and not the larger transmission system. If the distribution lines are down, it doesn’t matter how many transmission lines we have because the power cannot get to the consumer. Hurricane Sandy showed us that centralized power carried by lines over great distances does not guarantee reliability or a resilient grid.

In addition, we must also reexamine the way we calculate rates and how utilities make money. Utilities should be able to make money, but the old rate-making model rewards utilities for building too many of yesterday’s capital facilities that do not maximize reliability and resiliency when better options are available today. Those new lines could also have the effect of locking in a market for older fossil fuel generation while crowding out cleaner and less expensive options for generating power and ensuring reliability.

My constituents are requesting more details regarding the potential dangers posed to their families by electric and magnetic fields. They also question the planned route for the MCRP, along New Jersey Transit’s North Jersey Coast Line, using existing NJ Transit rights-of-way. This route would go from Aberdeen to Red Bank, cutting through the towns of Hazlet, Holmdel, and Middletown. In order for JCP&L to construct on this planned route, it must obtain permission from NJ Transit which has not yet been granted. JCP&L claims to have considered several alternative routes in favor of the preferred route, but it is not clear why the alternatives were rejected, or why these lines cannot be buried on all or part of the route. In fact, according to statements by JCP&L Transmission Planning Manager Lawrence A. Hozempa as part of the company’s August 9, 2016 filing with the BPU, it appears that the company rejected a number of other alternatives mainly because they involved routing the new line through existing transmission rights-of-way. This seems to fly in the face of economic prudence and efficiency and JCP&L fails to provide sufficient justification for the significant added costs and marginal benefits involved with the proposed route as opposed to some of the other alternatives considered. Further, the company explicitly admits that it failed to consider any non-transmission alternatives to the proposed project; this strikes me as particularly imprudent given the continued significant decline in electricity demand that has occurred since 2011 when the issues that gave rise to this proposal were first identified.

The preceding points are all the more disconcerting given that JCP&L recently proposed transferring all of JCP&L’s transmission assets, potentially to include the MCRP if constructed, to another company - Mid-Atlantic Interstate Transmission (MAIT) - which is a subsidiary of FirstEnergy. I offered a statement at the August 20, 2016 hearing about this proposal. I stated that I shared the concerns raised by the Board and the Rate Counsel about this proposed transfer, including whether MAIT would even be subject to New Jersey authority, the impact of the transfer on ratepayers and how the transfer could change the company’s priorities going forward. While I was heartened by JCP&L’s withdrawal of the transfer application in September, there is no guarantee that the company will not refile in the future.

When making its decision on the MCRP, I respectfully request that the Board seriously consider whether the project would actually increase reliability in Monmouth County, the impact the project would have on the communities along the route, and how this proposal would be impacted by system wide efforts of FirstEnergy.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

FRANK PALLONE, JR.
Member of Congress


Friday, September 16, 2016

Candidates for Township Committee, Mary Jo Fabiano & Ralph Borgess Pledge to Do What It Takes to Stop MCRP


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
September 15, 2016

Middletown Township Committee Candidates Mary Jo Fabiano and Ralph Borgess announced that, when elected, they will do everything it takes to oppose the Monmouth County Reliability Project (MCRP). They expressed disappointment with how the Township Committee has handled JCP&L’s proposal. They stated that the Committee is not acting aggressively enough to challenge JCP&L’s conclusions that allegedly support the project.

The MCRP has been proposed by JCP&L and includes installing a 230kV power line along the NJ Transit right of way from Red Bank to Aberdeen. The power lines will be installed on monopoles that could reach as high as 200 feet.

Ralph Borgess said that the Township needs to be more aggressive in approaching this issue. “Maser Consulting, the engineering firm contracted by the township as a utility expert needs to analyze the project from two perspectives:

  1. Is the project necessary?
  2. If necessary can the project be constructed in a way that minimizes the negative impact on Middletown residents?

There are better ways to advance the project, if it deemed to be necessary, while protecting the health of the residents in the path of the electric lines and preserve property values.”

Mary Jo Fabiano cited health concerns that may be caused by exposure to high voltage electrical lines. “This project runs along the NJ Transit train line, which is in close proximity to a number of schools as well as over 400 residences. Can we take the chance of continually exposing residents and children without conclusive data telling us this is safe?”

Both candidates agree that, if the need is there, this project should be moved underground where there are no unsightly monopoles and it is shielded by the earth it is buried in so that any negative health consequences are minimized.

########

Mary Jo Fabiano and Ralph Borgess are Democratic candidates for the Middletown Township Committee website: www.ABetterMiddletown.com